Serious investment thinking that doesn’t take itself too seriously.

HOME

LOGIN

ABOUT THE CURIOUS INVESTOR GROUP

SUBSCRIBE

SIGN UP TO THE WEEKLY

PARTNERS

TESTIMONIALS

CONTRIBUTORS

CONTACT US

MAGAZINE ARCHIVE

PRIVACY POLICY

SEARCH

-- CATEGORIES --

GREEN CHRONICLE

PODCASTS

THE AGENT

ALTERNATIVE ASSETS

THE ANALYST

THE ARCHITECT

ASTROPHYSIST

THE AUCTIONEER

THE ECONOMIST

EDITORIAL NOTES

FACE TO FACE

THE FARMER

THE FUND MANAGER

THE GUEST ESSAY

THE HEAD HUNTER

HEAD OF RESEARCH

THE HISTORIAN

INVESTORS NOTEBOOK

THE MACRO VIEW

POLITICAL INSIDER

THE PROFESSOR

PROP NOTES

RESIDENTIAL INVESTOR

TECHNOLOGY

UNCORKED

In Au of Gold

by | May 2, 2023

The Economist

In Au of Gold

by | May 2, 2023

Ask its bulls why they are evangelically in Au of gold, and you will never be short of reasons for being long. They point to it being a class insurance against dollar weakness; identifying too its lucrative luxury status in the eyes of burgeoning and conspicuous consumerist EM classes. Also pointed to is gold’s safe-haven status in the face of rising geo-political risk, and a highly sought-after store and transfer of wealth, flying as it does so low under DM tax and regulatory radars. Add to all this comparatively inelastic supply, and surely the argument for gold is compelling?

Well, I don’t buy it. Don’t get me wrong, I recognise gold is a real investable asset; unlike cryptos and NFTs. This accepted, I see gold as warranting only a fractional allocation of any sensible portfolio. For one, I am not in Au of it being anywhere close to the best fiduciary dollar hedge; its role in this regard being ever more reduced as currencies and sovereign debt of new wealth economies become more liquid; offering both yield and appreciation (most notably RMB, Aud and Cad, all three rich in Aurum).

Another reason for my cynicism is gold’s sedentary quality. Compare it to copper (whose conductivity means it will power along with China), uranium (go nuclear) or lithium (charge ahead with battery production), and you see a lazy metal, ‘unyielding’ in vaults and idle around necks and wrists; for less we forget, glistening diamonds can boast industrial uses. As for golds attractiveness due to its restrained supply, I would argue markets for industrial metals will prove tighter as China corners consumption and hoards mining capacity. Ironically too, as China invests sovereignly across EMs to get hold of their valued industrial and agricultural resources, it will literally power nations to extract gold more cheaply; think here SA, Ghana, DRC, and even Sudan, et al. Also, less we forget, China has its own awesome Aurum potential. We mustn’t too ignore Russia and its allegiants extracting even more gold for their hard currency good. As for new wealth within China et al, it will indeed thirst for Gold Watch; for the finest aged oaked single malt Scotch.

The reality is that whilst the dollar price of gold will move ever higher, it will generally fail to outpace dollar prices associated with copper, uranium, lithium, tantalum, et al. So, and to repeat, there are better places to lay-off a dollar whose global role rolls down from its all too lofty highs. And better places too to extract beta from rising EM wealth.

I am convinced that soon there will be a large realignment of exchange rates as the vast vat of savings globally react to ham-fisted monetary policy in the west by adjusting saving and pricing paradigm’s; the dollar giving way for other fiats to increase their weightings and become properly recognised reserves.

So yes, gold bulls will enjoy seeing its dollar price go ever higher. However, those Au struck measuring their wealth beyond dollar’s, run the real risk of it being debased. Only time will tell if this is Au bulls&*^.

About Savvas Savouri

About Savvas Savouri

Savvas has evenly divided his 33 year career in commercial finance between the Sell and Buy sides; the last 16 years as a Partner and Chief Economist at Toscafund. In the three years ahead of joining Tosca, Sav ran QuantMetriks, an independent advisory business he founded, utilising the global quant economics modelled launched in 1996. QM had been developed across a number of investment banks: from Credit Lyonnais, through Commerzbank & Lazard. Prior to entering ‘The City’ Sav earned Batchelor,  Masters and Doctoral degrees from the LSE, where he subsequently taught. He lectured over 1989-90 at The Institute of Statistics & Economics, University of Oxford, & was a visiting lecturer at Greenwich University 1990 & Moscow University, 1998. His work has been published in peer reviewed journals, including Economic Policy (1990), the Scottish Journal (1992) of Political Economy and Economic Journal (1992) as well as contributing chapters to a number of books covering empirical economics and econometrics. 

INVESTOR'S NOTEBOOK

Smart people from around the world share their thoughts

READ MORE >

THE MACRO VIEW

Recent financial news and how it connects across all asset classes

READ MORE >

TECHNOLOGY

Fintech, proptech and what it all means

READ MORE >

PODCASTS

Engaging conversations with strategic thinkers

READ MORE >

THE ARCHITECT

Some of the profession’s best minds

READ MORE >

RESIDENTIAL ADVISOR

Making money from residential property investment

READ MORE >

THE PROFESSOR

Analysis and opinion from the academic sphere

READ MORE >

FACE-TO-FACE

In-depth interviews with leading figures in the real estate/investment world.

READ MORE >