Serious investment thinking that doesn’t take itself too seriously.

HOME

LOGIN

ABOUT THE CURIOUS INVESTOR GROUP

SUBSCRIBE

SIGN UP TO THE WEEKLY

PARTNERS

TESTIMONIALS

CONTRIBUTORS

CONTACT US

MAGAZINE ARCHIVE

PRIVACY POLICY

SEARCH

-- CATEGORIES --

GREEN CHRONICLE

PODCASTS

THE AGENT

ALTERNATIVE ASSETS

THE ANALYST

THE ARCHITECT

ASTROPHYSIST

THE AUCTIONEER

THE ECONOMIST

EDITORIAL NOTES

FACE TO FACE

THE FARMER

THE FUND MANAGER

THE GUEST ESSAY

THE HEAD HUNTER

HEAD OF RESEARCH

THE HISTORIAN

INVESTORS NOTEBOOK

THE MACRO VIEW

POLITICAL INSIDER

THE PROFESSOR

PROP NOTES

RESIDENTIAL INVESTOR

TECHNOLOGY

UNCORKED

Property Stereotypes

by | Jan 9, 2019

Residential Investor

Property Stereotypes

by | Jan 9, 2019

After many years in the property industry I thought it time to reflect on my experiences and the people I have met.

The young estate agent: a raging mess of hormones and conflicting  interests. They talk the market up like a puppy but weep at night as without a correction they will never be a FTB (see below) themselves. Have been known to choose flight over fight and go off to sell private jets, because that’s a well-diversified industry.

The middle aged estate agent: the ultimate fantasists. Their most valuable asset is their house, their only source of income a buoyant property market. Even when the four horses of the apocalypse arrive (interest rates rises, SDLT, over supply, no Chinese buyers) they’ll be talking up the market.

The retiring estate agent: cynical and fatalistic, but they can afford to be. They have bought wisely over the years buying townhouses long ago for less than their junior colleagues paid for a studio. Also incredibly smug if they sold their company to one of the big firms at the top of the market.

Provincial town estate agent: in choppy waters and burdened with exorbitant rightmove fees. Best case scenario is a cameo appearance on Homes Under the Hammer.

The buying agent: charming and knowledgeable but, despite their claims, they always act in their own best interests. Supposedly essential in a rising market so you don’t overpay and in a falling market to identify the bargains but ultimately their income is based on transaction numbers. My advice is to go on an expensive holiday, spend half your time online investigating your chosen market and buy yourself. It’ll be cheaper.

The first time buyer: a rare species (especially if they graduated during the GFC or since). Almost totally reliant on Bank of Mum & Dad or Help to Buy. The former will mean Zone 2 (so their parents can come and stay without being stabbed), the latter will mean anywhere with a hipster coffee shop nearby. So anywhere from Zones 1 to 8.

The bargain hunter: disparagingly known as bottom feeders. They are the fish following whale carcass as it falls to the ocean floor. At first they watch, then they nibble at a few pieces of flesh. Before long the sharks are ripping the prime cuts of blubber off and no one can stop them.

The West End retail agent: the first time their email address appeared on an empty shop front to invite enquiries was a proud moment. The fact it is still there 18 months later does not bode well.

The office agent: in a world of big deals it has always been feast or famine. The famines last longer and their stomachs are not ready for the feasts. Tendency to fall off the wagon.

The Head of Property Research: stuck between a rock and a hard place. Do they logically explain their research and how the market is set to flatline (at best) or do the obediently bow to their residential department and shareholders and fudge the figures. Ultimately they just sugar coat bad news and issue a disclaimer.

The recruiter: probably someone who considered a career in property or had one before being put off by the Saturday work. Finds amusement in exaggerating commissions to naïve candidates; rash when their lifeboat too is holed below the water line.

The in-house recruiter: the nemesis of the agency recruiter. The ultimate poacher turned gamekeeper hell bent on obstructing his former colleagues doing any business.

The solicitor: Either from a city firm and heavy handed about clause 16.1.a.ii of a lease or from a provincial firm and utterly uncontactable, condescending to estate agents and with a chip on their shoulder that they haven’t achieved more with all their qualifications.

The mortgage broker: *spoiler alert* These are some of the few goods guys, often seen as an unnecessary expense but actually bastions of honesty and accuracy. They normally charge the bank for their fee, they’ll most likely find you a better rate and if they don’t they won’t force their product on you. Keep a good one saved in your phone for when interest rates rise.

The Agricultural College graduate: with nepotism frowned upon and even Strutt & Parker having a diversity drive their prospects are not good. They will not be Senior Partners and CEOs like the class of 1976.

The family office CFO: recently recruited to hold the purse strings. The books don’t balance and the assets have been bought on a whim rather than wisdom. The only option is to dig out of the hole with more spending, but after some analysis this time.

The proptech entrepreneur: have just had a hugely successful third round of funding, which they wouldn’t need if they were making a profit. Often adamant they will not employ property people which is akin to setting sail with a ship crewed by IT consultants.

The trust fund developer: an upscaled version of the Bank of Mum & Dad FTB. If they completed their first project by 2015 they think they are God’s gift to development and interior design (in reality they were just beneficiaries of the rising market). If they started after this they are now sharing a soap box with the middle aged estate agent and clutching the same basket of eggs.

The Chinese developer: they employ good people with property know how but then refuse to listen. Arrived to stoke the market but operate at the pace of a doped dragon. Gung-ho with the rules, known to have ordered the launch and marketing of a scheme which didn’t even have planning.

Knight Frank: seemingly property Elysium; nothing bad ever seems to befall them. Clearly an excellent PR team.

The res dev consultant: generally acting for one of the international agencies they are the punch bag. Beaten up in weekly meetings (which could easily be fortnightly) by the developer because sales targets are not being met. The elephant in the room is “Price Reductions”.

The International Project Marketing Team: the conquistadors of the canape circuit. Their natural habitat is the China Club or the bar of any Mandarin Oriental in the Far East. They turn left on the plane and return to London with a book full of reservations. At least they used to.

The client-side Sales Director: sensible, understanding, often from an agency background so has been the punch bag. Firm but fair. Some have a somewhat demanding alter ego when they are jet-lagged and under pressure from their CEO, when this emerges it is best to lie low.

The Housebuilder CEO: He’d rather not talk about it, but why would you with £75m to spend.

About Searchlight Post

About Searchlight Post

The Searchlight is controlled and written by a senior property professional still involved in the thick of the market . The aim is to be insightful and analytical without being too presumptive and hypocritical. Enjoy the musings. @FPDSearchlight

INVESTOR'S NOTEBOOK

Smart people from around the world share their thoughts

READ MORE >

THE MACRO VIEW

Recent financial news and how it connects across all asset classes

READ MORE >

TECHNOLOGY

Fintech, proptech and what it all means

READ MORE >

PODCASTS

Engaging conversations with strategic thinkers

READ MORE >

THE ARCHITECT

Some of the profession’s best minds

READ MORE >

RESIDENTIAL ADVISOR

Making money from residential property investment

READ MORE >

THE PROFESSOR

Analysis and opinion from the academic sphere

READ MORE >

FACE-TO-FACE

In-depth interviews with leading figures in the real estate/investment world.

READ MORE >