Serious investment thinking that doesn’t take itself too seriously.

HOME

LOGIN

ABOUT THE CURIOUS INVESTOR GROUP

SUBSCRIBE

SIGN UP TO THE WEEKLY

PARTNERS

TESTIMONIALS

CONTRIBUTORS

CONTACT US

MAGAZINE ARCHIVE

PRIVACY POLICY

SEARCH

-- CATEGORIES --

GREEN CHRONICLE

PODCASTS

THE AGENT

ALTERNATIVE ASSETS

THE ANALYST

THE ARCHITECT

ASTROPHYSIST

THE AUCTIONEER

THE ECONOMIST

EDITORIAL NOTES

FACE TO FACE

THE FARMER

THE FUND MANAGER

THE GUEST ESSAY

THE HEAD HUNTER

HEAD OF RESEARCH

THE HISTORIAN

INVESTORS NOTEBOOK

THE MACRO VIEW

POLITICAL INSIDER

THE PROFESSOR

PROP NOTES

RESIDENTIAL INVESTOR

TECHNOLOGY

UNCORKED

An incoherent proposal

by | Jul 12, 2019

The Guest Essay

An incoherent proposal

by | Jul 12, 2019

Most large funds hate development risk – but there are real success stories out there. You just have to avoid the more spurious schemes…

Monday morning’s first call is from an old market chum asking if I’ll meet his latest client. He thinks this firm has something very attractive, unique, scalable and set to capture the stellar outperformance of the Irish housing market in recent years. 

Property is always interesting. I like deals that can be scaled up, and I like solid large returns. As many of our London investors are looking to diversify out of core London and the UK, I agree. Irish ‘resi’ sounds interesting. I ask for further information including financials, but apparently this team are in town tomorrow, and if I can make time to meet them they’ll explain their deal in detail. I set aside an hour.

Tuesday morning, and 20 minutes late, a young Irishman pops into the office to present his real estate vision. He’s got the blarney turned up to 11 as he rattles through plans his team have to develop promising sites near Dublin’s motorway. 

The pitch book is very glossy. They will build new affordable homes and make lots of money by doing so. He tells me it’s relevant to me because I’m going to give him the money to build them, and he’s going to pay me a fabulous 6% interest for doing so.

I’m bemused. He thinks I’m grinning because I’m buying it. 

He’s wrong.

I listen as he explains his competitive advantage, which largely comprises what he learnt during his five years working for an American bank. Then he describes his executive team: one of his mates who left school early and is now running his own building company, and another who was a planning officer and is able “to get things done”. Their “unparalleled” experience gives them a clear “USP” in the sector, he tells me. I’m very aware of the huge profits established Irish builders have been making.

I explain that we’d really need to understand their previous successes in terms of projects, sales and margins, asking how’d they funded themselves thus far, and how much equity they would be putting in. 

It turns out they haven’t actually done anything yet. 

For the last two years they’ve been trying to raise money. When I ask about equity, he tells me it’s all in the land we’ll buy for them – which I sort of understand, but am unlikely to accept.

Then he tells me a bigger reason he wanted to meet me is because his new financial advisers think I’ll be a lead buyer of a new eurobond issue he’s launching to fund his projects. The firm has “filed docs” to raise €50 million through a bond listed on the Copenhagen Exchange. It will pay 6% interest per annum, “which is much more than you’ll get investing in other eurobonds,” he tells me.

I notice the documents he hands me are dated last year, and ask if this means they’ve already launched the bond. “Oh, yes, it’s doing very well, we’ve got great interest, and we’ll be getting some big orders for Middle East family offices this week.” My heart sinks. I tell him I have to wind up the meeting.

Of course, they haven’t sold any bonds, and I know the “Middle East family offices” might remain interested – but definitely uncommitted. 

I ask the chap some questions. Has he heard of LCF and mini-bond misselling? Apparently not. I ask what he’s going to do with a block of €50m if investors commit, and then explain coupon drag to him – how is he going to pay investors’ returns if he can’t make his money work immediately? He responds they’ll focus on building and selling houses quickly so they can pay the coupons, and can use money they don’t spend buying land and materials to pay the first year’s.

I make it as clear as I can that this isn’t a project I’m interested in, but do offer to pass is details to some property development lenders I work with. He’s amazed I’m passing down this superb opportunity. The first property development lender I speak to tells me I did the right thing walking away.

There are plenty of good property opportunities paying real returns on risk. Property development risk is an interesting one. Most large funds aren’t prepared to take development risk – they want to invest in completed projects. I can understand why; everyone has heard the rumours of new lenders and crowdfunding sites losing millions on unwise development lending (and sure enough, at least one is now on special watch by the FCA).

But, some of the professional development lenders I deal with can show real success, having lent billions of pounds, experienced minimal defaults and achieved solid double-digit returns. 

What’s their secret? 

Understanding their market, knowing who to lend to – and who to refuse. Basic credit skills and project management understanding. They’d never lend 100% of a property development upfront. They will lend bite by bite as the project reaches milestones. They’ll lend up to 60% of LTV and 80% of cost, forcing the developer to bear the equity risk. And if it looks like going wrong, they’ll exercise their step-in-rights and take control – which is the last thing they want to do, but will if they need to.

***

My second call on Monday morning is much more interesting – a client who’s been an occasional investor in aviation bonds. We’re discussing the cancellation of the Airbus A380 superjumbo, and the fact a number of older aircraft have already been scrapped. The immediate market reaction has been knee-jerk – a tumble in the prices of bonds secured on A380s. 

We both reckon the market has overreacted. The airlines using A380s are not about to dump the planes: they will use them till the end of the current leases and keep paying the lease charges and fees. Critically, the senior debt on these deals will be repaid by the end of the lease. 

The cancellation of the programme may be bad news, but it won’t change the payment due on the bonds. And since these bonds have crashed in price, we set out and buy some blocks of them on the cheap. Bond maths means cheap bonds yield more!

The rest of the week involves a look at potential waste-disposal-project funding in Europe, a couple of new aviation proposals and an aquaponics projects that’s up and running in the US and looking to expand in Europe. That immediately gets interest from our inhouse investment team and a couple of clients. 

By the end of the week we’ve due-diligenced the project and got the first couple of meetings arranged.

About Napoleon Bonnacord-Smith

About Napoleon Bonnacord-Smith

Napoleon Bonnacord-Smith runs the alternative asset team within a well-known City firm. After too many years spent in M&A, capital markets and fund management, he now eyes every potential opportunity with a well-practised cynical eye.

INVESTOR'S NOTEBOOK

Smart people from around the world share their thoughts

READ MORE >

THE MACRO VIEW

Recent financial news and how it connects across all asset classes

READ MORE >

TECHNOLOGY

Fintech, proptech and what it all means

READ MORE >

PODCASTS

Engaging conversations with strategic thinkers

READ MORE >

THE ARCHITECT

Some of the profession’s best minds

READ MORE >

RESIDENTIAL ADVISOR

Making money from residential property investment

READ MORE >

THE PROFESSOR

Analysis and opinion from the academic sphere

READ MORE >

FACE-TO-FACE

In-depth interviews with leading figures in the real estate/investment world.

READ MORE >