Serious investment thinking that doesn’t take itself too seriously.

HOME

LOGIN

ABOUT THE CURIOUS INVESTOR GROUP

SUBSCRIBE

SIGN UP TO THE WEEKLY

PARTNERS

TESTIMONIALS

CONTRIBUTORS

CONTACT US

MAGAZINE ARCHIVE

PRIVACY POLICY

SEARCH

-- CATEGORIES --

GREEN CHRONICLE

PODCASTS

THE AGENT

ALTERNATIVE ASSETS

THE ANALYST

THE ARCHITECT

ASTROPHYSIST

THE AUCTIONEER

THE ECONOMIST

EDITORIAL NOTES

FACE TO FACE

THE FARMER

THE FUND MANAGER

THE GUEST ESSAY

THE HEAD HUNTER

HEAD OF RESEARCH

THE HISTORIAN

INVESTORS NOTEBOOK

THE MACRO VIEW

POLITICAL INSIDER

THE PROFESSOR

PROP NOTES

RESIDENTIAL INVESTOR

TECHNOLOGY

UNCORKED

Consilia Capital Real Assets Fund Monitor

by | Oct 1, 2018

The Fund Manager

Consilia Capital Real Assets Fund Monitor

by | Oct 1, 2018

This monthly report from Consilia Capital on fund performance looks at a number of different topics.

August performance  – which strategies performed best?

Global real estate securities funds returns August 2018

Source: Consilia Capital/Bloomberg

As can be seen from the table below, (which is ranked by average August returns for each main mandate) August saw a modest recovery (after a dreadful 1H 18) particularly for US and Income Funds, which have now joined European Funds in generating positive returns for the year to date. 

Source: Consilia Capital/Bloomberg

Fund Flows- What are the trends?

After an uptick in inflows in August for Passive Funds, this reversed back to the negative trend YTD in August. Income and Real assets funds have had a third successive month of inflows. 

Listed and Unlisted Real Estate Performance in European Pension Funds  

Although there is no shortage of academic studies on listed real estate performance, there is a shortage of papers focussed on actual fund data, performance and allocations. This month we summarise a report on this topic produced by CEM Benchmarking, and commissioned by EPRA. The report focusses on:

  1. Asset allocation

Dutch funds allocate 8 percent to real estate on average, split 25/75 between listed and unlisted real estate. U.K and Other Euro area funds allocate just over 5 percent to real estate on average, nearly all of it unlisted.

Trends Dutch funds are de-risking, reducing allocations to equities and real estate while increasing allocations to fixed income. U.K. funds are doing the opposite, increasing allocation to equity and real estate while lowering allocation to fixed income. Other Euro area funds are comparatively stable.

  1. Lagged reporting

Asset class returns for private equity, unlisted real estate, and unlisted infrastructure as recorded by funds are not comparable to listed asset class returns. The reason is lagged reporting. For all three asset classes, the average lag is nearly one calendar year.

Because of the dispersion in reporting lag, average annual returns from unlisted asset classes appear significantly smoothed (i.e., less volatile than they are). Smoothed returns from unlisted asset classes is purely mathematical artifact, and not something a fund can achieve.

  1. Returns

Listed real estate – the arithmetic average net return for Dutch funds (2005-2016) was the second highest at 9.32 percent, comparable to private equity at 10.78 percent. For other Euro area funds over the shorter sample period 2008-2016 it was considerably lower at 5.59 percent compared to 11.55 percent for private equity. For U.K. funds where only 2010-2016 data is available for all asset classes, listed real estate had the highest net return of 10.93 percent, nearly equal to public and private equity at 10.76 and 10.86 respectively.

  1. Risk

Sharpe ratios for all asset classes are consistent across Dutch and other Euro area funds with the exception

of hedge funds (data has not converged) and unlisted infrastructure (insufficient data). Relative order is

(from highest Sharpe ratio to lowest): 1. Fixed income, 2. private equity, 3/4. public equity/listed real estate (a statistical tie), 5. unlisted real estate, 6. “other”.

  1. Correlation

After standardising returns of unlisted asset classes for lagged reporting, listed and unlisted real estate are seen to be highly correlated to each other for Dutch funds (correlation of 88 percent), but less so for other Euro area funds (correlation of 58 percent), and not at all U.K. funds (correlation of negative 9 percent). The low correlation for other Euro area funds likely reflects differences in listed and unlisted real estate portfolio construction. By contrast, for U.K. funds the low correlation likely results from shared management of listed and unlisted real estate portfolios, resulting in lagged reporting of listed real estate returns as well.

  1. The Portfolio Volatility Suppression impact of Unlisted Real Estate 

In conclusion the primary effect of unlisted real estate and other unlisted assets on total fund returns is to artificially supress volatility. By standardizing unlisted asset class returns, CEM estimate that the volatility of total fund returns is suppressed by anywhere from seven percent (other Euro Area funds) to 16 percent (Dutch funds).

August performance  Alternative strategies

Source: Consilia Capital/Bloomberg

About Alex Moss

About Alex Moss

Alex Moss is Director of the Real Estate Research Centre at The Business School (formerly Cass), City, University of London.

INVESTOR'S NOTEBOOK

Smart people from around the world share their thoughts

READ MORE >

THE MACRO VIEW

Recent financial news and how it connects across all asset classes

READ MORE >

TECHNOLOGY

Fintech, proptech and what it all means

READ MORE >

PODCASTS

Engaging conversations with strategic thinkers

READ MORE >

THE ARCHITECT

Some of the profession’s best minds

READ MORE >

RESIDENTIAL ADVISOR

Making money from residential property investment

READ MORE >

THE PROFESSOR

Analysis and opinion from the academic sphere

READ MORE >

FACE-TO-FACE

In-depth interviews with leading figures in the real estate/investment world.

READ MORE >