Serious investment thinking that doesn’t take itself too seriously.

HOME

LOGIN

ABOUT THE CURIOUS INVESTOR GROUP

SUBSCRIBE

SIGN UP TO THE WEEKLY

PARTNERS

TESTIMONIALS

CONTRIBUTORS

CONTACT US

MAGAZINE ARCHIVE

PRIVACY POLICY

SEARCH

-- CATEGORIES --

GREEN CHRONICLE

PODCASTS

THE AGENT

ALTERNATIVE ASSETS

THE ANALYST

THE ARCHITECT

ASTROPHYSIST

THE AUCTIONEER

THE ECONOMIST

EDITORIAL NOTES

FACE TO FACE

THE FARMER

THE FUND MANAGER

THE GUEST ESSAY

THE HEAD HUNTER

HEAD OF RESEARCH

THE HISTORIAN

INVESTORS NOTEBOOK

THE MACRO VIEW

POLITICAL INSIDER

THE PROFESSOR

PROP NOTES

RESIDENTIAL INVESTOR

TECHNOLOGY

UNCORKED

Death of the office? Better call Saul!

by | Jun 2, 2020

The Economist

Death of the office? Better call Saul!

by | Jun 2, 2020

A TV series about a struggling lawyer gives us some clues on what the post-Covid office might look like.  

The announcement by Twitter that it will no longer oblige employees to ever return to the office has fuelled the “death of the office” narrative that has accompanied the Coronavirus pandemic. This is the theory we will need far less office space as a result of widespread home working during the lockdown. However, less widely reported was a podcast from Goldman Sachs, where the bank’s CFO, Stephen Scherr, said that while 98% of their staff were successfully working from home, he considered that situation to be neither “desirable” nor “sustainable”. Mr Scherr cited the benefits of creativity and interaction as the strengths of the office. 

This coincides with growing anecdotal evidence I have encountered that working from home is taking a toll on many. A recurring theme I am encountering from business contacts is people reporting fatigue from a barrage of video conferences. Another common complaint is that hours have got much longer now the work desk is in the home. Others mention a sense of isolation, and missing banter with colleagues. 

Backlash 

The “death of the office” narrative depends on projecting a short-term occurrence, the lockdown’s enforced homeworking, far into the future. However, the lesson of history is people who have had something imposed on them with little or no choice often go in the opposite direction when choice returns. After the rationing and austerity of the 1940s, the British embraced rampant consumerism in the 1950s. Let us remember that the recent homeworking regime was similarly imposed on people, so could also be followed by a backlash against it. 

Afterall, one could debate whether people, once the pandemic is over, will want to stay in their isolated home offices for much more than one day a fortnight for certain quiet tasks, like report writing. While in theory that means 10% of desks are no longer needed, the only way to realise the space saving is hot desking, and some are openly questioning whether that will be considered acceptable post-Covid, with new attitudes to cleanliness and personal space. 

A backlash against hot desking is particularly easy to imagine, as it was never as popular as its enthusiasts liked to maintain. I have even known firms with fixed desks use that as a means to lure staff from competitors who adopted hot desking. This all threatens the drive for densification of recent decades. In the future, a workforce that has come through a pandemic may want more personal space. With salary costs in many firms outweighing property costs by as much as ten to one, there is compelling reason for employers to prioritise staff satisfaction. 

Netflix inspiration 

So, what might the post-pandemic office look like if we do backlash against homeworking, but are reluctant to step away from the health benefits of distance? On a lockdown Netflix binge, I found some inspiration in the TV series, Better Call Saul, which is set in the legal industry of Albuquerque, New Mexico, in the early 2000s. 

The many legal and corporate offices visited in the series are a far cry from what we are now used to. Around half of all staff are in their own cellular office, and the other half have cubicles that occupy a generous amount of space. Critically, these offices could not be better set up to provide the social distanced workplace that is about to become the new normal. I would rather work in the offices in Better Call Saulover the next two years than either a pre-pandemic flexible office, or continue the lonely home working. 

More not less 

So, am I really predicting that going forwards office fit out will hurtle backwards 15 to 20 years in time, with all the partitions and glass box offices returning? No, but sometimes we need an extreme example to help visualise what is realistic. After all, the “death of the office” narrative is itself an unlikely extreme whose value is in provoking discussion on what is actually ahead. 

What I would argue is the debate on the future of the office after the virus needs to seriously consider the option that we will spread out, give more space to workstations that are allocated to individuals – my desk, no one else’s germs. Staff will want the social benefits of having colleagues around, and employers will want the creativity that comes from this human interaction. All this brings us back to the office, but adapted to a world now conscious of infection. 

This leads me to conclude we will move towards something halfway between our previous flexible workplaces, and the cellular offices of Better Call Saul. The dividing walls will not return, but we shall have our own desks spaced far enough apart to keep staff feeling reassured. Consequently, we need to seriously consider the possibility that firms, even after redundancies caused by the recession, may end up occupying a similar volume of space, just at lower densities than pre-Covid. 

This beckons the question: surely this means property costs will rise as a proportion of business expenses at a time when firms will want the complete opposite? Yes, but sweating assets for many business services or tech firms means getting staff operating at their optimum level, which brings us back to the earlier comments about the higher levels of creativity and interaction found in the office. Rebuilding revenue will justify the cost, and there are also ways to control the expense. 

Multiple sites 

Once we move from recession to recovery, firms will take a much closer look at the roles they have being performed in expensive CBD locations. This could result in the new jobs created in the next business cycle being distributed around multiple sites, either within the same city or elsewhere in the country. The firm that in the pre-Covid world had 150 people in one office in central London, will by 2023 have a 30-person satellite office further afield, with the remaining 120 in the HQ now enjoying more space at their desks. 

Even before the pandemic, we were seeing examples of firms redistributing jobs widely across the country, with more firms embracing ‘North shoring’.  A consequence of the pandemic could be that economic activity becomes more evenly spread around the country, as firms expand their office footprint in a manner that gives staff space but keeps the rent bill under control. 

About James Roberts

About James Roberts

James Roberts is Chief Economist at Independent Property Analysis.

INVESTOR'S NOTEBOOK

Smart people from around the world share their thoughts

READ MORE >

THE MACRO VIEW

Recent financial news and how it connects across all asset classes

READ MORE >

TECHNOLOGY

Fintech, proptech and what it all means

READ MORE >

PODCASTS

Engaging conversations with strategic thinkers

READ MORE >

THE ARCHITECT

Some of the profession’s best minds

READ MORE >

RESIDENTIAL ADVISOR

Making money from residential property investment

READ MORE >

THE PROFESSOR

Analysis and opinion from the academic sphere

READ MORE >

FACE-TO-FACE

In-depth interviews with leading figures in the real estate/investment world.

READ MORE >