Serious investment thinking that doesn’t take itself too seriously.

HOME

LOGIN

ABOUT THE CURIOUS INVESTOR GROUP

SUBSCRIBE

SIGN UP TO THE WEEKLY

PARTNERS

TESTIMONIALS

CONTRIBUTORS

CONTACT US

MAGAZINE ARCHIVE

PRIVACY POLICY

SEARCH

-- CATEGORIES --

GREEN CHRONICLE

PODCASTS

THE AGENT

ALTERNATIVE ASSETS

THE ANALYST

THE ARCHITECT

ASTROPHYSIST

THE AUCTIONEER

THE ECONOMIST

EDITORIAL NOTES

FACE TO FACE

THE FARMER

THE FUND MANAGER

THE GUEST ESSAY

THE HEAD HUNTER

HEAD OF RESEARCH

THE HISTORIAN

INVESTORS NOTEBOOK

THE MACRO VIEW

POLITICAL INSIDER

THE PROFESSOR

PROP NOTES

RESIDENTIAL INVESTOR

TECHNOLOGY

UNCORKED

Happy 80th anniversary Desert Island Discs! 

by | May 26, 2022

The Storyteller

Happy 80th anniversary Desert Island Discs! 

by | May 26, 2022

But why no Desert Island DVDs?, asks this writer

We’ve all heard of Desert Island Discs and most of us have probably, in an idle moment or when trying hard to concentrate on something really important, fantasised about being invited onto the programme and have made our list of eight favourite records. Devised by Roy Plomley in 1942 and then in effect ‘owned’ by him and subsequently by his widow, Diana Wong, it’s been running off and on for 80 years (there was a break between 1946 and 1951). There have been more than 3,000 shows. 

It’s a terrific, winning idea for a radio programme, so why I thought (in one of my own idle moments) has there never been a Desert Island Movies programme on the main TV channels or streaming platforms, where guests play clips from their favourite films? Technological limitations would have made such an idea implausible in years gone by – there’s no power available on the imaginary island and while a wind-up record player is allowed so as to play the vinyls, wind-up film projectors, VHS or DVD players never really caught on. But in the recent past, the existence of super-long-life batteries and solar-powered DVD players make such a show’s premise feasible, so why no Desert Island DVDs

Part of the answer lies in rights issues. The programme is still owned by the Plomley family and the BBC would also claim an interest, having been the producers of the show since its inception. According to Michael Parkinson, the show’s presenter from 1985 to 1988, ownership rights even gave Diana Wong an input into the choice of who should front DID as well as, it is presumed, on its format and style. How these parties would react to the idea of a TV variation on such a well-loved and respected institution is anyone’s guess, but they may have serious concerns about devaluing the purely musical version. 

“This could be an uncomfortable watch and an even more difficult experience for the guests, as they have what can be an intimate therapy session played out in full public view”

The format of the new DIDVD movie show would be quite tricky too. Are guests allowed free rein or should they be limited to say, eight popular genres from which they have to select? Not all films fit neatly into a single category and even the list of genres would be the subject of debate. Access to and obtaining the permission to play some films could also be problematic – play rights affected the DID radio show for years, as one couldn’t hear the show replayed on Listen Again for reasons of music rights ownership. Castaways would, of course, be visible to the camera and, as anyone who has listened to the radio show will testify, a guest’s musical journey is a usually a sound track to their lives and they are often deeply moved as they recall childhood, lost friends and family, career struggles and successes, and life’s other ups and downs. Just as in the Who Do You Think You Are? TV series, there have been tears on DID and filmed, this could be an uncomfortable watch and an even more difficult experience for the guests, as they have what can be an intimate therapy session played out in full public view. 

So, having identified the Weaknesses and Threats of this idea and decided it’s not really viable, what is there left to do but trial it? How about the following as the eight film genres from which our hypothetical guest would make their hypothetical choices on this hypothetical show?

Crime, drama. Many film buffs and critics would suggest the following as a shortlist: A Few Good Men, The Godfather, The French Connection, On the Waterfront, The Firm, Taxi Driver, From Here to Eternity, Good Will Hunting, Citizen Kane…

Comedy, satire. Annie Hall; Some Like it Hot; Four Weddings and a Funeral; School of Rock; Fargo; Shrek; Trains, Planes & Automobiles; Dr Strangelove; This is Spinal Tap… 

War, adventure, Westerns. The Hurt Locker; Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid; The Wild Bunch; Lawrence of Arabia; The Bridge on the River Kwai; Run Silent, Run Deep; Saving Private Ryan; Raiders of the Lost Ark…

Musical. West Side Story, Singing in the Rain, Cabaret, La La Land, An American in Paris… 

Art house, absurdist, surreal. Fellini’s La Dolce Vita, The Seventh Seal, Patha Panchali, Onibaba, Roma (2018), A Special Day (1977), Terry Gilliam’s Brazil...

NB Some films which we regard as art house were actually intended to be pretty mainstream by their makers, but because they were in black and white and in a foreign language, in the UK and USA they became art house!

Romance. Casablanca, Shakespeare in Love, Sleepless in Seattle, Dirty Dancing, Jane Eyre, Pride and Prejudice… 

History, epic. Schindler’s List, Apollo 13, Lincoln, The Age of Innocence, Spartacus, A Man for All Seasons…

Horror, sci-fi and fantasy. The Shining, The Terminator, 2001 A Space Odyssey, Blade Runner, Lord of the Rings (a great choice as is nine hours long – good value on a desert island!), Solaris, It’s a Wonderful Life…

I know what my eight would be: On the Waterfront, Dr Strangelove, Lawrence of Arabia, Cabaret, A Special Day, Casablanca, A Man for All Seasons and Blade Runner (the version without the voice-over). So now you choose: use these genres, ignore them or make your own, but don’t forget, your choices will have to sustain you in isolation, perhaps for years, so they better be good and capable of being watched multiple times.

1…………………

2…………………

3…………………

4…………………

5…………………

6…………………

7…………………

8…………………

As to a book and a luxury, that might be stepping over the rights ownership and IP lines, so I couldn’t possibly say. David Hockney’s 1972 book selection was certainly provocative (although not, apparently, amusing to a disdainful Roy Plomley) – a work of American pornography, reportedly so badly written he found it fascinating. It wouldn’t be my choice!

About David Shiers

About David Shiers

Graduating with an MA in Creative Writing in 2021, David Shiers was formerly Reader in Sustainable Property and is now an Affiliate of the School of the Built Environment at Oxford Brookes University. He was co-author (with BRE) of the Green Guide to Specification - an environmental profiling system for construction materials and part of the BREEAM and the Code for Sustainable Homes programmes; helping designers and specifiers to reduce the environmental impacts of their buildings. Globally, there are more than 558,200 BREEAM certified developments and almost 2,260,300 buildings registered for assessment. Green Guide has been the recommended materials specification standard for the UK Government, many Local Authorities and private sector organisations such as the Westfield retail group and was used in the building of the London 2012 Olympics. David was a judge on the Construction News panel for the national UK Building Quality Awards between 2010-2013. His research paper, Socially Responsible Property Investment (SRPI), written with Miles Keeping, Dan Rapson and Claire Roberts, was cited as a key text in United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Finance Initiative report Building Responsible Property Portfolios.

INVESTOR'S NOTEBOOK

Smart people from around the world share their thoughts

READ MORE >

THE MACRO VIEW

Recent financial news and how it connects across all asset classes

READ MORE >

TECHNOLOGY

Fintech, proptech and what it all means

READ MORE >

PODCASTS

Engaging conversations with strategic thinkers

READ MORE >

THE ARCHITECT

Some of the profession’s best minds

READ MORE >

RESIDENTIAL ADVISOR

Making money from residential property investment

READ MORE >

THE PROFESSOR

Analysis and opinion from the academic sphere

READ MORE >

FACE-TO-FACE

In-depth interviews with leading figures in the real estate/investment world.

READ MORE >