Serious investment thinking that doesn’t take itself too seriously.

HOME

LOGIN

ABOUT THE CURIOUS INVESTOR GROUP

SUBSCRIBE

SIGN UP TO THE WEEKLY

PARTNERS

TESTIMONIALS

CONTRIBUTORS

CONTACT US

MAGAZINE ARCHIVE

PRIVACY POLICY

SEARCH

-- CATEGORIES --

GREEN CHRONICLE

PODCASTS

THE AGENT

ALTERNATIVE ASSETS

THE ANALYST

THE ARCHITECT

ASTROPHYSIST

THE AUCTIONEER

THE ECONOMIST

EDITORIAL NOTES

FACE TO FACE

THE FARMER

THE FUND MANAGER

THE GUEST ESSAY

THE HEAD HUNTER

HEAD OF RESEARCH

THE HISTORIAN

INVESTORS NOTEBOOK

THE MACRO VIEW

POLITICAL INSIDER

THE PROFESSOR

PROP NOTES

RESIDENTIAL INVESTOR

TECHNOLOGY

UNCORKED

If the Bank of England does not raise interest-rates in response to 4% inflation, when will it?

by | Sep 15, 2021

The Economist

If the Bank of England does not raise interest-rates in response to 4% inflation, when will it?

by | Sep 15, 2021

This morning has seen something of a different event, but it has given us an insight into the thoughts of the Bank of England. This is because QuickBooks arranged an ‘Ask the Expert’ session with Michael Saunders of the Bank of England on YouTube. Let us pick up on his replies. We can start via Live Squawk on his view of the economy.

BoE’s Saunders: Level of GDP now probably fairly close to pre-pandemic levels.

If we look around, there are some signals hinting in that direction, such as the reports that traffic has returned to what were previously regarded as normal levels. In terms of forecasting performance, this means that the Bank of England has been behind events, as this from the February Monetary Report shows.

GDP is projected to reach its 2019 Q4 level by 2022 Q1.

In fact, that itself was an upwards revision.

such that the economic impact of Covid fades somewhat more rapidly than previously projected.

While the path of Covid-19 and the economic effects have been at times unpredictable, it is also true that they have been consistently too low in their estimates. This matters because they have set policy for that, as I will come to.

Inflation

Here the questions seemed to anticipate what is coming tomorrow as the Treasury Select Committee in Parliament.

MPs are likely to explore the BoE’s forecast that inflation will rise to 4%, and the Monetary Policy Committee’s continued expanding of quantitative easing.

Here is this morning’s answer.

BoE’S Saunders: Inflation has increased more quickly than planned. (@FinancialJuice)

It is hard not to have a wry smile at that as we remind ourselves of their prediction in February.

As those effects drop out of the annual calculation over the rest of 2021, and recent rises in energy prices feed through to petrol and utility prices, inflation is projected to rise sharply towards the target.

Actually, they have a small window of respite as last month, in something of a head fake, the CPI annual rate was reported at 2%. Those seeing it as a change of trend are about to get a shock over the next couple of months. The RPI gave a much better signal by only dipping marginally to 3.8%, but that will be ignored by the Bank of England.

There was a confession that inflation is about to surge again.

I’m concerned that continuing to buy assets while CPI is at 4% may lead medium-term inflation expectations to rise. (@FinancialJuice)

However, we did get an attempt to distract us by moving from the reality above to something of a fantasy world at the end. He is focusing on inflation expectations for two reasons. The first is that they tend to be lower than inflation.

Market gauge of long-term eurozone inflation expectations rises to highest since Feb 2018 at over 1.76% (@PriapusIQ)

Whereas Euro area inflation is 3%. Why is this so? It’s easy really: markets have no idea and we are often dealing with markets where central banks intervene with their bond purchases either explicitly as in the US ( buying TIPs) or indirectly like the Bank of England does via its own QE. The second is that they are in the future and provide another excuse for not acting now.

We did get the word ‘transitory’ thrown into the mix as well as this.

The United Kingdom will not deal with a long-term inflation issue. (@FinancialJuice )

I presume he does not mean they will just ignore it, as that is much too close to the truth!

House prices

Completely ignored – as it is by the CPI inflation measure – was this from the Halifax earlier.

Average house prices climbed again in August, with the cost of a property increasing by 0.7% or £1,789.
Back-to-back monthly price gains have now pushed the cost of a typical home to a record of £262,954,
topping the previous high (£261,642) recorded in May this year.

So another rise to a new record which is on what is the largest purchase many of his audience will or have already made. So any sensible inflation measure simply should not ignore this in my opinion.

However, compared to June 2020, when the housing market began to reopen from the first lockdown,
prices remain more than £23,600 higher (or +9.9%).

As importantly, while there is an obvious bias here, the Halifax thinks it will continue.

We believe structural factors have driven record levels of buyer activity – such as the demand for more
space amid greater home working. These trends look set to persist and the price gains made since the
start of the pandemic are unlikely to be reversed once the remaining tax break comes to an end later this
month.

Policy response

We already know that Michael Saunders voted to stop QE bond purchases at £830b. What else would he do? Via FXStreet.

“Should ease off the accelerator rather than apply brakes.”

So this is a confirmation of what he voted for. But we did get some views on official interest rates or Bank Rate?

“Maybe right to think of rates going up in next year or so, depending on economic conditions.”

That is hardly convincing and even that vague effort is undermined by this.

“If bank rate does rise in next year or so, it would be relatively limited.”

So it would go from 0.1% to 0.2%? I am not being as silly as it might seem, because their previous move was a cut of 0.15%. So, let us say back up to 0.25%. But, frankly, what use would that be against inflation at 4%?

More questions are begged because, as he does not intend to do much, how will it change this?

“This could cause a more severe monetary policy response later.”

As well as what would he consider to be a “severe” response?

Comment

We learn quite a bit, I think, from what are the throwaway lines. For example, he defined the 2% inflation target with the output objective, which means that inflation was always going to be allowed to overshoot. This raises another problem, which is that, while the UK economy has recovered pretty strongly, we are now in more stormy waters. We were always worried about the impact of the end of the furlough schemes and this will happen as overseas worries are in play as well. For example, the New York Fed has not done this because the numbers were going to rise.

The uncertainty around the pandemic and the consequent volatility in the data have posed a number of challenges to the Nowcast model. Therefore, we have decided to suspend the publication of the Nowcast while we continue to work on methodological improvements to better address these challenges.

It was 3.8% annualised and thus was about to take a dive from that. So inflation before there and here seem set to be ignored by the Fed and Bank of England until we get to stage 4.

It’s too late now.

Or as I put it on the 6th of August.

What we learn from that is they have no intention of making even modest rises in interest rates. The plan looks to be to dither so much that by then the next downturn will have arrived.

Is it arriving now?

Switching to Michael Saunders, he did at least vote to stop the QE bond purchases. But they carry on as there will be another £1.15b this afternoon. The effect of this and all the credit easing is being felt in the mortgage market.

 

Quoted mortgage rates falling rapidly across all loan-to-value (LTV) ratios. Rates on two year fixed rate: at 75% LTV and below are at record lows, above 75% LTV still higher than pre-pandemic, but falling quickly. (Neal Hudson).

I pointed out in this week’s podcast that the Bank of England chose a 1% interest rate as a level for reducing QE because it has no intention of getting there. Let me add that there are now roads ahead where it does not raise at all.

Originally published by Notayesmanseconomics’s Blog and reprinted here with permission.

About Shaun Richards

About Shaun Richards

Shaun is an independent economist who studied at the London School of Economics. His speciality is monetary economics. Shaun worked in the City of London for several investment banks and then on his own account over a period of 15 years. After initially working in the government bond department at Phillips and Drew Ltd. he moved on into the derivatives arena with options of all types being a speciality.

INVESTOR'S NOTEBOOK

Smart people from around the world share their thoughts

READ MORE >

THE MACRO VIEW

Recent financial news and how it connects across all asset classes

READ MORE >

TECHNOLOGY

Fintech, proptech and what it all means

READ MORE >

PODCASTS

Engaging conversations with strategic thinkers

READ MORE >

THE ARCHITECT

Some of the profession’s best minds

READ MORE >

RESIDENTIAL ADVISOR

Making money from residential property investment

READ MORE >

THE PROFESSOR

Analysis and opinion from the academic sphere

READ MORE >

FACE-TO-FACE

In-depth interviews with leading figures in the real estate/investment world.

READ MORE >