Serious investment thinking that doesn’t take itself too seriously.

HOME

LOGIN

ABOUT THE CURIOUS INVESTOR GROUP

SUBSCRIBE

SIGN UP TO THE WEEKLY

PARTNERS

TESTIMONIALS

CONTRIBUTORS

CONTACT US

MAGAZINE ARCHIVE

PRIVACY POLICY

SEARCH

-- CATEGORIES --

GREEN CHRONICLE

PODCASTS

THE AGENT

ALTERNATIVE ASSETS

THE ANALYST

THE ARCHITECT

ASTROPHYSIST

THE AUCTIONEER

THE ECONOMIST

EDITORIAL NOTES

FACE TO FACE

THE FARMER

THE FUND MANAGER

THE GUEST ESSAY

THE HEAD HUNTER

HEAD OF RESEARCH

THE HISTORIAN

INVESTORS NOTEBOOK

THE MACRO VIEW

POLITICAL INSIDER

THE PROFESSOR

PROP NOTES

RESIDENTIAL INVESTOR

TECHNOLOGY

UNCORKED

Protesters battle to expropriate big Berlin landlords

by | Apr 5, 2021

Residential Investor

Protesters battle to expropriate big Berlin landlords

by | Apr 5, 2021

The campaign in Berlin to drive a stake through the heart of large German residential landlords moved into its second phase last week, when the Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co. movement began collecting signatures in its petition to cut large housing owners down to size. 

The goal is to expropriate the holdings of landlords owning and managing more than 3,000 apartments in the city in return for compensation, and transfer the apartments into common ownership. At least 12 companies fall into this category, but Deutsche Wohnen, as the second-largest housing company in Germany and the owner of more than 120,000 apartments in its stronghold of Berlin, is the prime and most visible target of the protesters’ ire.

The initiative requires the support and signatures of 170,000 Berliners, or at least 7% of local inhabitants who are eligible to vote in Berlin state election – which effectively means German citizens registered in Berlin. The activists have until 25 June to collect enough signatures to demand a referendum, which would then be added to the ballot on 26 September this year, when both Berlin state elections and the German national elections take place. 

The highly controversial campaign envisages expropriating – and then compensating the owners for – some 230,000 apartment units

In the first phase of the campaign last year, the initiative did manage to gather the required 77,000 signatures to get their campaign ball rolling, with Berlin’s Interior Ministry validating the legitimacy of the petition, after months of deliberation.

The highly controversial campaign envisages expropriating – and then compensating the owners for – some 230,000 apartment units. However, the campaign puts the cost of compensation at somewhere below €13bn, while the Senate estimates compensation costs at well more than double that, at €29bn.

Of the red-red-green ruling coalition in Berlin, only the hard-left Die Linke party are throwing their weight behind the campaign. Their three cabinet ministers in the Berlin government will be prominently signing the petition, they say. The left-of-centre coalition partner SPD rejects the move totally, while the Greens have held back from endorsing what it sees as a move too radical for its taste. 

Nonetheless, the Greens have described the petition as a “wake-up call to politicians to enforce the guiding principle of ‘property comes with obligations’ as laid down in the constitution. While we support the goals of the petition, we are critical of the general quantitative hurdles – such as the expropriation proposed by the initiative for a certain number of apartments,” according to party leader Werner Graf.

Deutsche Wohnen, as the second-largest housing company in Germany, is the prime and most visible target of the protesters’ ire

On the opposition benches, the CDU recently presented an opinion poll which showed that 51% of Berliners are against the expropriation move, while 36% were in favour, 11% were unsure and 2% gave no response. This demonstrated clearly, said CDU leader Kai Wegner, that Berliners were against ideology and class warfare, but did want a fair deal in a well-regulated market.

The opposition FDP is against the move, on the grounds that it doesn’t lead to the building of a single new dwelling to help ease the affordable housing shortage in the city. Likewise, the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) calls the movement “economic madness” and the debt burden the city would have to take on to compensate the owners would be so heavy it would hamstring the city in any attempts to launch a new building programme to bridge the housing deficit.

This article was originally published by REFIRE and here is here republished with permission.

About Charles Kingston

About Charles Kingston

Charles Kingston is the Publisher and Editor-in-Chief of REFIRE, a specialist newsletter and website focused on German real estate for institutional investors. Based in Berlin, he has lived in Germany for 30 years, and can look back on a varied career including stints working for the Financial Times, the DeAgostini Group, the Toronto Globe and Mail, and as a proprietary derivatives trader. A native Dubliner, he graduated with a degree in Business from University College Dublin, and subsequently pursued post-graduate studies in real estate finance at the University of Middlesex.

INVESTOR'S NOTEBOOK

Smart people from around the world share their thoughts

READ MORE >

THE MACRO VIEW

Recent financial news and how it connects across all asset classes

READ MORE >

TECHNOLOGY

Fintech, proptech and what it all means

READ MORE >

PODCASTS

Engaging conversations with strategic thinkers

READ MORE >

THE ARCHITECT

Some of the profession’s best minds

READ MORE >

RESIDENTIAL ADVISOR

Making money from residential property investment

READ MORE >

THE PROFESSOR

Analysis and opinion from the academic sphere

READ MORE >

FACE-TO-FACE

In-depth interviews with leading figures in the real estate/investment world.

READ MORE >